Immigrants from Latin America vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 482,149,950 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.746. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 5.7 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 15.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $47,848, a difference of 7.4%), and median household income ($75,420 compared to $72,682, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($41,049 compared to $41,252, a difference of 0.50%), per capita income ($36,823 compared to $37,203, a difference of 1.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,219 compared to $86,125, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 30.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (21.2% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 2.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and male poverty (13.6% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 18.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 16.0%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 10.5%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 1.3%), family households (67.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple households (44.7% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 33.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 11.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 89.1%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 11.5%), and high school diploma (82.1% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 0.15%), bachelor's degree (30.1% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and master's degree (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 48.2%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 45.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 1.4%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.6%).