Immigrants from Eastern Europe vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 424,440,207 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Eastern Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.122. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Eastern Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Eastern Europe corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,316 compared to $37,203, a difference of 32.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,662 compared to $80,843, a difference of 29.5%), and median household income ($93,051 compared to $72,682, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income over 65 years ($62,693 compared to $54,133, a difference of 15.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,572 compared to $47,848, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 43.4%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.0% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 43.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.6% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.76%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 12.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 33.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 31.7%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.39%), married-couple households (47.4% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (64.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 75.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.7% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 15.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.2%), master's degree (17.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 54.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.3% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.18%), 9th grade (95.2% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.27%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Eastern Europe and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 53.5%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 49.3%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.4%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.4%).