Thai vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Thai
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Thais

Cherokee

Exceptional
Fair
10,191
SOCIAL INDEX
99.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
2nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Thai Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,518,662 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Thai communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.337. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Thais within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Thais corresponds to a decrease of 3.5 Cherokee.
Thai Integration in Cherokee Communities

Thai vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Thai and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($110,648 compared to $72,682, a difference of 52.2%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($121,778 compared to $80,843, a difference of 50.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($129,560 compared to $86,125, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (30.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.1%), householder income under 25 years ($59,187 compared to $47,848, a difference of 23.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($72,099 compared to $54,133, a difference of 33.2%).
Thai vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricThaiCherokee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$54,307
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,281
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$110,648
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,237
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$72,135
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$47,577
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$59,187
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$121,778
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$129,560
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$72,099
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
30.5%
Tragic
27.4%

Thai vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Thai and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 76.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (11.6% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 69.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (11.7% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 68.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 10.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.0% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 33.6%).
Thai vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricThaiCherokee
Poverty
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
17.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.5%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.9%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
13.2%

Thai vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Thai and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 47.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 35.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (3.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.2%).
Thai vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricThaiCherokee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.8%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Thai vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Thai and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 16.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.4%).
Thai vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricThaiCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.2%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.9%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.6%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.0%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
84.3%
Tragic
79.0%

Thai vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Thai and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 52.6%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 36.3%), and divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.2%), family households (67.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (50.9% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 8.4%).
Thai vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricThaiCherokee
Family Households
Exceptional
67.2%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
30.6%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
51.9%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
50.9%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
24.0%
Tragic
36.7%

Thai vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Thai and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.55%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.8%).
Thai vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricThaiCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.9%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.9%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.8%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
7.7%

Thai vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Thai and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (21.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 91.0%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 90.3%), and professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 86.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.030%), 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.15%).
Thai vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricThaiCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.7%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.1%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.1%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
73.4%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
68.6%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
57.4%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
50.1%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Thai vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Thai and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 80.2%), vision disability (1.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 67.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 67.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 10.6%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 11.6%), and self-care disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 38.3%).
Thai vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricThaiCherokee
Disability
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.1%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.4%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.9%