Chilean vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,732,315 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.707. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.117% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 117.3 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $37,203, a difference of 24.9%), median household income ($90,605 compared to $72,682, a difference of 24.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $86,125, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 4.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $47,848, a difference of 11.2%), and median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $48,669, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 39.3%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 34.7%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 16.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 22.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 12.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 19.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 18.4%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.13%), family households (65.2% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.31%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 27.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.7%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 49.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 51.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 46.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 23.2%).