Taiwanese vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Taiwanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Taiwanese

Cherokee

Good
Fair
6,532
SOCIAL INDEX
62.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
151st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Taiwanese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,337,306 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Taiwanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.650. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Taiwanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.833% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Taiwanese corresponds to an increase of 833.0 Cherokee.
Taiwanese Integration in Cherokee Communities

Taiwanese vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,492 compared to $80,843, a difference of 25.5%), per capita income ($46,455 compared to $37,203, a difference of 24.9%), and median household income ($89,900 compared to $72,682, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,804 compared to $47,848, a difference of 4.1%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and median male earnings ($55,556 compared to $48,669, a difference of 14.1%).
Taiwanese vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricTaiwaneseCherokee
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,455
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$107,295
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,900
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,902
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,556
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Excellent
$40,576
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,804
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$101,492
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$104,180
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,894
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.1%
Tragic
27.4%

Taiwanese vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 49.8%), single male poverty (10.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 47.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 6.8%).
Taiwanese vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricTaiwaneseCherokee
Poverty
Good
12.2%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Good
11.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Good
13.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.2%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.6%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.5%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
13.2%

Taiwanese vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 55.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 53.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 50.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.77%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.0%).
Taiwanese vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTaiwaneseCherokee
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.5%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Good
4.5%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.3%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.0%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Taiwanese vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 19.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 6.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.1%).
Taiwanese vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTaiwaneseCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.8%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.7%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
79.0%

Taiwanese vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 26.5%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 19.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (45.9% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (45.8% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.5%).
Taiwanese vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTaiwaneseCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Fair
45.9%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Poor
45.8%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.0%
Tragic
36.7%

Taiwanese vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 50.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 14.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 11.1%).
Taiwanese vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTaiwaneseCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.4%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.9%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.0%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.7%

Taiwanese vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 51.2%), no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 43.3%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.51%), high school diploma (87.9% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.68%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.80%).
Taiwanese vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricTaiwaneseCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.3%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.7%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Good
66.4%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
60.7%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Excellent
47.7%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.0%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.1%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
1.5%

Taiwanese vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Taiwanese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 57.0%), vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 51.0%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 50.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.3%), disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 20.3%).
Taiwanese vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricTaiwaneseCherokee
Disability
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
22.7%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%