Portuguese vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 404,103,889 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 13.6 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $80,843, a difference of 23.0%), median household income ($88,976 compared to $72,682, a difference of 22.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $86,125, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.20%), householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $54,133, a difference of 13.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $47,848, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 31.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 29.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.40%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.16%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 0.69%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 12.8%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.19 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.12%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 23.4%), master's degree (13.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (88.5% compared to 88.5%, a difference of 0.0%), 12th grade, no diploma (90.6% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 29.4%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.4%), and ambulatory disability (6.4% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 5.6%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.6%).