Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Congo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Congo

Cherokee

Fair
Fair
2,417
SOCIAL INDEX
21.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
260th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Immigrants from Congo Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,512,005 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.229. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.068% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to a decrease of 68.1 Cherokee.
Immigrants from Congo Integration in Cherokee Communities

Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 26.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $80,843, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($77,850 compared to $86,125, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $34,742, a difference of 1.2%), per capita income ($35,720 compared to $37,203, a difference of 4.2%), and median earnings ($39,169 compared to $41,252, a difference of 5.3%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricImmigrants from CongoCherokee
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$35,720
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,216
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Tragic
$66,768
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,169
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$44,204
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$34,317
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$43,266
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$72,178
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$77,850
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$51,393
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
27.4%

Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 27.6%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (22.5% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (25.3% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.5%), single mother poverty (33.8% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from CongoCherokee
Poverty
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Tragic
14.7%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Tragic
17.4%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
24.6%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.7%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
22.5%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
22.4%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
22.7%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.9%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Tragic
25.3%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
33.8%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.5%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
13.2%

Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 46.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from CongoCherokee
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.9%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.1%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.5%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
6.7%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.5%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Fair
9.0%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from CongoCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.5%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.6%
Tragic
79.0%

Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (39.0% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 19.7%), single mother households (8.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 19.1%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.33%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.65%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.4%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from CongoCherokee
Family Households
Tragic
59.2%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Fair
27.3%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
39.0%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.1%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.5%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
36.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 47.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 35.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 14.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 29.9%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from CongoCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.0%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.1%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.0%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
7.7%

Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 37.4%), bachelor's degree (33.6% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and master's degree (12.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.75%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.77%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from CongoCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.9%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.7%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.8%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.6%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 65.7%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 44.9%), and male disability (11.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 3.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 9.6%).
Immigrants from Congo vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from CongoCherokee
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.1%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.3%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.7%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Good
2.9%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%