Alsatian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 80,089,510 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.016. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to a decrease of 11.2 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $37,203, a difference of 27.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,059 compared to $80,843, a difference of 17.6%), and median household income ($85,053 compared to $72,682, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $47,848, a difference of 3.0%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 11.1%), and median male earnings ($55,380 compared to $48,669, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 16.6%), receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 15.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.1% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 0.64%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (19.1% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 61.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 31.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.52%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.73%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 12.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.3% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 22.2%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 15.6%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (45.7% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple households (44.8% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 70.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 43.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 27.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 58.1%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 48.5%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.6% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 47.3%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 35.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 30.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 1.8%), disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 17.8%).