Swedish vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,042,063 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Swedish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.501. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swedes within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.081% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swedes corresponds to an increase of 81.4 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swedish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,377 compared to $86,125, a difference of 23.5%), median family income ($108,499 compared to $88,209, a difference of 23.0%), and per capita income ($45,750 compared to $37,203, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.4% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($52,986 compared to $47,848, a difference of 10.7%), and median female earnings ($39,421 compared to $34,742, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swedish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 49.5%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 48.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 12.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.2% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and single father poverty (16.3% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 20.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swedish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swedish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 9.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.8% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swedish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 24.1%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 23.7%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.45%), family households (64.5% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.73%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.18, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.8% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swedish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.9%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 35.9%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swedish and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 35.0%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 8.8%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.1%).