Scandinavian vs Cherokee Community Comparison

COMPARE

Scandinavian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cherokee
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Scandinavians

Cherokee

Good
Fair
7,944
SOCIAL INDEX
76.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
98th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,697
SOCIAL INDEX
24.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
243rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cherokee Integration in Scandinavian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 427,419,388 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.498. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.314% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 313.6 Cherokee.
Scandinavian Integration in Cherokee Communities

Scandinavian vs Cherokee Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $86,125, a difference of 19.6%), median household income ($86,073 compared to $72,682, a difference of 18.4%), and median family income ($104,410 compared to $88,209, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 6.1%), householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $47,848, a difference of 10.0%), and median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $34,742, a difference of 10.3%).
Scandinavian vs Cherokee Income
Income MetricScandinavianCherokee
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,848
Tragic
$37,203
Median Family Income
Good
$104,410
Tragic
$88,209
Median Household Income
Good
$86,073
Tragic
$72,682
Median Earnings
Average
$46,433
Tragic
$41,252
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,527
Tragic
$48,669
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,306
Tragic
$34,742
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,654
Tragic
$47,848
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Good
$95,596
Tragic
$80,843
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Good
$102,969
Tragic
$86,125
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Good
$61,586
Tragic
$54,133
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
29.1%
Tragic
27.4%

Scandinavian vs Cherokee Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 39.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.7% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 11.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 19.3%).
Scandinavian vs Cherokee Poverty
Poverty MetricScandinavianCherokee
Poverty
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.6%
Tragic
10.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Fair
20.3%
Tragic
22.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
17.2%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.7%
Tragic
21.7%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.1%
Tragic
19.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
19.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
19.9%
Single Males
Poor
13.1%
Tragic
16.1%
Single Females
Average
21.1%
Tragic
25.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
19.6%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
34.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Average
11.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Tragic
13.2%

Scandinavian vs Cherokee Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 25.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.0%).
Scandinavian vs Cherokee Unemployment
Unemployment MetricScandinavianCherokee
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.5%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.6%
Fair
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.5%
Fair
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Poor
4.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Poor
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Excellent
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Tragic
9.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Excellent
7.4%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.7%

Scandinavian vs Cherokee Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 75.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.6%).
Scandinavian vs Cherokee Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricScandinavianCherokee
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Fair
65.0%
Tragic
61.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
43.6%
Exceptional
40.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
78.5%
Exceptional
75.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
82.1%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.5%
Tragic
81.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
81.4%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
83.0%
Tragic
79.0%

Scandinavian vs Cherokee Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 23.2%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.13%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.4%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.8%).
Scandinavian vs Cherokee Family Structure
Family Structure MetricScandinavianCherokee
Family Households
Exceptional
65.0%
Exceptional
65.0%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Average
27.5%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Good
46.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.14
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
6.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.5%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Poor
12.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.8%
Tragic
36.7%

Scandinavian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 3.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.79%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 3.1%).
Scandinavian vs Cherokee Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricScandinavianCherokee
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
93.1%
Exceptional
92.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
62.1%
Exceptional
59.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
23.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.7%

Scandinavian vs Cherokee Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 28.7%), master's degree (14.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 26.3%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.24%).
Scandinavian vs Cherokee Education Level
Education Level MetricScandinavianCherokee
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Exceptional
96.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
96.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Average
92.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.2%
Tragic
90.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.5%
Poor
88.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.9%
Tragic
83.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
60.1%
College, 1 year or more
Excellent
61.0%
Tragic
53.2%
Associate's Degree
Good
46.9%
Tragic
38.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.5%
Tragic
30.2%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.4%
Tragic
11.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.5%

Scandinavian vs Cherokee Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 34.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 30.1%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 13.4%).
Scandinavian vs Cherokee Disability
Disability MetricScandinavianCherokee
Disability
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Tragic
12.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
14.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
23.4%
Tragic
28.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.6%
Tragic
50.2%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
7.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%