Ute vs Cherokee Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,918,726 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Cherokee within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.203. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Cherokee. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 5.0 Cherokee.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $47,848, a difference of 4.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($83,937 compared to $86,125, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,949 compared to $54,133, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($72,402 compared to $72,682, a difference of 0.39%), median male earnings ($48,899 compared to $48,669, a difference of 0.47%), and median earnings ($41,051 compared to $41,252, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 24.1%), poverty (16.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.8%), and family poverty (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (15.7% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 2.4%), single mother poverty (35.7% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 44.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 44.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 8.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 81.6%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.4% compared to 81.4%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.9%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 11.1%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.18, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 0.95%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 49.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.9%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 38.7%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.0%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Cherokee communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 105.8%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 32.0%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 3.3%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 50.2%, a difference of 4.7%).