Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Boys 0-16
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa

6.2%
51.5%
Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Child Poverty (Boys) vs State vs National
1. 74106 51.5% 20.6% (+30.9)#30 16.9% (+34.6)#1,860
2. 74103 50.0% 20.6% (+29.4)#37 16.9% (+33.1)#1,971
3. 74126 49.4% 20.6% (+28.8)#40 16.9% (+32.5)#2,077
4. 74108 47.4% 20.6% (+26.8)#47 16.9% (+30.5)#2,286
5. 74110 45.2% 20.6% (+24.6)#56 16.9% (+28.3)#2,559
6. 74127 41.5% 20.6% (+20.9)#70 16.9% (+24.6)#3,083
7. 74115 38.7% 20.6% (+18.1)#91 16.9% (+21.8)#3,601
8. 74129 38.5% 20.6% (+17.9)#92 16.9% (+21.6)#3,630
9. 74130 37.1% 20.6% (+16.5)#101 16.9% (+20.2)#3,947
10. 74146 36.0% 20.6% (+15.4)#106 16.9% (+19.1)#4,142
11. 74116 35.0% 20.6% (+14.4)#116 16.9% (+18.1)#4,379
12. 74107 33.7% 20.6% (+13.1)#127 16.9% (+16.8)#4,698
13. 74131 32.0% 20.6% (+11.4)#153 16.9% (+15.1)#5,148
14. 74128 27.4% 20.6% (+6.82)#194 16.9% (+10.5)#6,636
15. 74105 27.4% 20.6% (+6.79)#195 16.9% (+10.5)#6,640
16. 74136 26.9% 20.6% (+6.31)#200 16.9% (+10.0)#6,803
17. 74104 26.2% 20.6% (+5.56)#211 16.9% (+9.26)#7,082
18. 74112 25.3% 20.6% (+4.67)#226 16.9% (+8.37)#7,443
19. 74119 19.3% 20.6% (-1.28)#313 16.9% (+2.42)#10,267
20. 74145 17.8% 20.6% (-2.77)#343 16.9% (+0.930)#11,041
21. 74135 16.9% 20.6% (-3.67)#353 16.9% (+0.035)#11,548
22. 74134 16.3% 20.6% (-4.29)#360 16.9% (-0.587)#11,939
23. 74133 12.9% 20.6% (-7.70)#415 16.9% (-4.00)#14,188
24. 74120 11.4% 20.6% (-9.22)#439 16.9% (-5.51)#15,228
25. 74114 10.8% 20.6% (-9.81)#449 16.9% (-6.11)#15,692
26. 74132 7.3% 20.6% (-13.4)#503 16.9% (-9.65)#18,722
27. 74137 6.2% 20.6% (-14.4)#513 16.9% (-10.7)#19,617

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
51.5%
#2
50.0%
#3
49.4%
#4
47.4%
#5
45.2%
#6
41.5%
#7
38.7%
#8
38.5%
#9
37.1%
#10
36.0%
What zip code has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
74106 has the Highest Child Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK with 51.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Tulsa is 27.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in Oklahoma is 20.6%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Boys Under the Age of 16 in the United States is 16.9%.