Immigrants from China vs Tongan Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Tongan
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Tongans
18.1%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
19th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Tongan Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,922,860 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 18.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,377,778 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.098 and weighted average of 18.8%, a difference of 3.5%.

Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Tongan |
Minimum | 7.4% | 4.0% |
Maximum | 33.3% | 45.5% |
Range | 25.9% | 41.5% |
Mean | 16.3% | 19.1% |
Median | 15.7% | 18.2% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.6% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.6% | 22.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.9% | 8.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 8.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 8.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Tongans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (18.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Greece (18.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Maltese (18.3%, a difference of 0.74%), Burmese (18.3%, a difference of 0.75%), and Asian (18.3%, a difference of 0.76%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Armenia (18.7%, a difference of 0.66%), Turkish (18.7%, a difference of 0.68%), Immigrants from Japan (18.6%, a difference of 0.86%), Korean (18.6%, a difference of 0.92%), and Immigrants from Philippines (18.6%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | China | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 18.1% |
Immigrants | Greece | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Maltese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Burmese | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Asians | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Armenians | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Israel | 100.0 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 18.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 100.0 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 18.4% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 100.0 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Poland | 100.0 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.9 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 18.5% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.9 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.9 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 99.9 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 18.6% |
Turks | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 18.7% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 18.8% |