New Zealander vs Tongan Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tongan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Tongans

Excellent
Good
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tongan Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 55,792,113 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.827. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 24.869% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 24,869.2 Tongans.
New Zealander Integration in Tongan Communities

New Zealander vs Tongan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $41,693, a difference of 21.3%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $53,218, a difference of 15.0%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $45,665, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.92%), householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $68,235, a difference of 1.3%), and median household income ($95,146 compared to $93,076, a difference of 2.2%).
New Zealander vs Tongan Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderTongan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Tragic
$41,693
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Excellent
$105,967
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Exceptional
$93,076
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Fair
$45,665
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Fair
$53,218
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Tragic
$38,288
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Exceptional
$56,972
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Exceptional
$99,604
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Exceptional
$108,643
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Exceptional
$68,235
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Tragic
27.5%

New Zealander vs Tongan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (16.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 36.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 26.6%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.4%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.6%).
New Zealander vs Tongan Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderTongan
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Exceptional
17.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Exceptional
14.2%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Exceptional
13.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Exceptional
26.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.7%

New Zealander vs Tongan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 2.2%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.8%).
New Zealander vs Tongan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderTongan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%

New Zealander vs Tongan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 8.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.42%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.63%).
New Zealander vs Tongan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderTongan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Exceptional
41.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Exceptional
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Excellent
83.1%

New Zealander vs Tongan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 20.5%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 15.2%), and family households (62.9% compared to 69.6%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.4% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 6.9%).
New Zealander vs Tongan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderTongan
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Exceptional
69.6%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
31.2%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Exceptional
51.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Exceptional
28.4%

New Zealander vs Tongan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 54.7%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 42.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 12.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 30.3%).
New Zealander vs Tongan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderTongan
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Exceptional
7.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Exceptional
92.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Exceptional
63.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Exceptional
26.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
10.0%

New Zealander vs Tongan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 60.3%), master's degree (18.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 46.3%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.69%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.70%).
New Zealander vs Tongan Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderTongan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
93.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Poor
90.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Fair
64.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Poor
57.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
34.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Poor
1.7%

New Zealander vs Tongan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.7%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.8%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 4.0%).
New Zealander vs Tongan Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderTongan
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Fair
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%