Immigrants from China vs Tongan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
Tongan
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Immigrants from China
Tongans
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
32nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
22nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs Tongan Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,614,379 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 102,543,831 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.308 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 1.7%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from China | Tongan |
Minimum | 0.83% | 1.7% |
Maximum | 42.3% | 27.0% |
Range | 41.4% | 25.3% |
Mean | 12.6% | 11.9% |
Median | 10.7% | 11.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.6% | 8.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.9% | 15.1% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 7.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 7.2% | 5.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 7.1% | 5.5% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China and Tongans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Tongans are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (13.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Latvian (13.4%, a difference of 0.080%), Indian (Asian) (13.3%, a difference of 0.68%), Bolivian (13.3%, a difference of 0.72%), and Bulgarian (13.3%, a difference of 0.78%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Norwegians | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Bolivians | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Indians (Asian) | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 99.9 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Tongans | 99.9 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Latvians | 99.9 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |