Czech vs Tongan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 98,887,097 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.624. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.323% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 323.1 Tongans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $68,235, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $56,972, a difference of 10.8%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $93,076, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($105,839 compared to $105,967, a difference of 0.12%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $38,288, a difference of 1.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($96,525 compared to $99,604, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 38.9%), single male poverty (13.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 29.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 0.11%), poverty (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.22%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and female unemployment (4.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.3% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 0.85%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (27.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 13.4%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.49, a difference of 12.3%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (49.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple households (49.4% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 36.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 52.5%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.0%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.86%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 16.8%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 5.9%).