Burmese vs Tongan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tongan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Tongans

Exceptional
Good
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tongan Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,303,861 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.217. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 6.7 Tongans.
Burmese Integration in Tongan Communities

Burmese vs Tongan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,005 compared to $41,693, a difference of 24.7%), median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $53,218, a difference of 22.6%), and median earnings ($54,559 compared to $45,665, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.0%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $56,972, a difference of 4.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $68,235, a difference of 4.3%).
Burmese vs Tongan Income
Income MetricBurmeseTongan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Tragic
$41,693
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Excellent
$105,967
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Exceptional
$93,076
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Fair
$45,665
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Fair
$53,218
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Tragic
$38,288
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$56,972
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Exceptional
$99,604
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Exceptional
$108,643
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Exceptional
$68,235
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
27.5%

Burmese vs Tongan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 26.6%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.2%), and receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.35%), single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and poverty (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.4%).
Burmese vs Tongan Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseTongan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
17.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
14.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
13.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
26.5%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
9.7%

Burmese vs Tongan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 26.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 18.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.4%).
Burmese vs Tongan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseTongan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%

Burmese vs Tongan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 19.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.59%).
Burmese vs Tongan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseTongan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Exceptional
41.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Exceptional
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Excellent
83.1%

Burmese vs Tongan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 23.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.5%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple households (49.8% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
Burmese vs Tongan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseTongan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
69.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
31.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
51.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
28.4%

Burmese vs Tongan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 47.1%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 34.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 28.5%).
Burmese vs Tongan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseTongan
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
7.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
92.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
63.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
26.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
10.0%

Burmese vs Tongan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 65.3%), master's degree (19.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 57.7%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 53.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.35%).
Burmese vs Tongan Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseTongan
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
93.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Poor
90.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Tragic
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Fair
64.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Poor
57.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Tragic
34.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Poor
1.7%

Burmese vs Tongan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 18.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.7%), ambulatory disability (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.7%).
Burmese vs Tongan Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseTongan
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Fair
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%