Chilean vs Tongan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tongan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Tongans

Excellent
Good
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
7,132
SOCIAL INDEX
68.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
130th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tongan Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 81,593,207 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Tongans within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.262. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.095% in Tongans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 95.2 Tongans.
Chilean Integration in Tongan Communities

Chilean vs Tongan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $41,693, a difference of 11.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $56,972, a difference of 7.1%), and median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $53,218, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $99,604, a difference of 0.30%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $108,643, a difference of 1.9%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $105,967, a difference of 2.3%).
Chilean vs Tongan Income
Income MetricChileanTongan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Tragic
$41,693
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Excellent
$105,967
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Exceptional
$93,076
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Fair
$45,665
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Fair
$53,218
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Tragic
$38,288
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Exceptional
$56,972
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Exceptional
$99,604
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Exceptional
$108,643
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Exceptional
$68,235
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.5%

Chilean vs Tongan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 28.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 4.3%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 5.1%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.9%).
Chilean vs Tongan Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanTongan
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
9.7%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
17.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
11.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.4%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
13.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
13.6%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
10.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
18.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
12.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
26.5%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Exceptional
10.5%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.7%

Chilean vs Tongan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 31.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 23.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 4.0%).
Chilean vs Tongan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanTongan
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
10.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
15.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
5.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
6.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
4.7%

Chilean vs Tongan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 41.2%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.38%).
Chilean vs Tongan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanTongan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
41.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Average
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
83.5%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Excellent
83.1%

Chilean vs Tongan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.7%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 51.6%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 2.9%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and family households (65.2% compared to 69.6%, a difference of 6.9%).
Chilean vs Tongan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanTongan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
69.6%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
31.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Exceptional
51.6%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.49
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.8%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.3%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Exceptional
28.4%

Chilean vs Tongan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 56.9%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 37.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.9%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 26.5%, a difference of 34.7%).
Chilean vs Tongan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanTongan
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
7.2%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Exceptional
92.9%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Exceptional
63.5%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
26.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
10.0%

Chilean vs Tongan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.5%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 35.6%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.25%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.25%).
Chilean vs Tongan Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanTongan
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.8%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.7%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.7%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.6%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
97.5%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Tragic
95.4%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Tragic
95.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
94.4%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
93.3%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Poor
92.2%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Poor
90.7%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
88.4%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Fair
85.2%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Fair
64.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Poor
57.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
43.0%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
34.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Poor
1.7%

Chilean vs Tongan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Tongan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 8.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%).
Chilean vs Tongan Disability
Disability MetricChileanTongan
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
10.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Fair
23.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
48.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Good
2.9%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%