Indian (Asian) vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,388,120 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $106,888, a difference of 11.8%), median household income ($105,262 compared to $95,319, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($122,343 compared to $111,914, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.1%), per capita income ($53,874 compared to $51,770, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $66,376, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 9.8%), and single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.13%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.55%), and female poverty (12.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.010%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.7%), births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 12.4%), and single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.0% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.81%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (65.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 35.8%), doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 23.2%), and professional degree (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 19.4%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 15.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.1%).