Guyanese vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,673,860 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Guyanese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guyanese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.006% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guyanese corresponds to an increase of 6.3 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 49.0%), per capita income ($40,949 compared to $51,770, a difference of 26.4%), and median family income ($93,373 compared to $116,165, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,210 compared to $54,352, a difference of 1.6%), median female earnings ($40,973 compared to $43,571, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($45,470 compared to $52,361, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 73.3%), family poverty (11.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 46.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 0.35%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and single male poverty (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 39.9%), male unemployment (7.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 39.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.70%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (27.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 33.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 42.8%), births to unmarried women (35.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 23.9%), and currently married (41.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.3% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 0.39%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (65.3% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 148.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 65.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.8% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 24.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 52.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 61.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 71.2%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 66.7%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guyanese and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 36.2%), disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.8%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.13%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.83%), and disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.9%).