Navajo vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,905,029 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Navajo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.150. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Navajo within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Navajo corresponds to a decrease of 1.5 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($29,031 compared to $51,770, a difference of 78.3%), median family income ($70,989 compared to $116,165, a difference of 63.6%), and median household income ($59,159 compared to $95,319, a difference of 61.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 22.0%), householder income under 25 years ($42,380 compared to $54,352, a difference of 28.2%), and median female earnings ($33,046 compared to $43,571, a difference of 31.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 158.6%), family poverty (18.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 145.2%), and male poverty (22.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 122.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (40.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 47.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (30.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 58.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (19.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 65.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (9.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 106.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (10.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 100.7%), and male unemployment (9.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 92.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 7.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (73.8% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 15.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (64.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 15.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.2% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (32.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 14.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 81.4%), single mother households (8.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 66.1%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.6%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and family households (66.4% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 42.3%), no vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 25.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (55.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.8% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 102.6%), master's degree (9.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 96.7%), and bachelor's degree (23.6% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 86.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Navajo and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (33.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 58.7%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 55.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 55.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.6%), cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 15.7%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.5%).