Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
6,462
SOCIAL INDEX
62.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
152nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 193,285,569 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from South Eastern Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Eastern Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Eastern Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.0 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,539 compared to $51,770, a difference of 18.9%), median male earnings ($55,241 compared to $62,217, a difference of 12.6%), and wage/income gap (24.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,714 compared to $54,352, a difference of 2.5%), householder income over 65 years ($64,089 compared to $66,376, a difference of 3.6%), and median household income ($91,541 compared to $95,319, a difference of 4.1%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Per Capita Income | Average $43,539 | Exceptional $51,770 |
| Median Family Income | Excellent $106,252 | Exceptional $116,165 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $91,541 | Exceptional $95,319 |
| Median Earnings | Excellent $47,671 | Exceptional $52,361 |
| Median Male Earnings | Good $55,241 | Exceptional $62,217 |
| Median Female Earnings | Excellent $40,558 | Exceptional $43,571 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,714 | Exceptional $54,352 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $100,283 | Exceptional $106,888 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,109 | Exceptional $111,914 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,089 | Exceptional $66,376 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 24.8% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.9%), single father poverty (14.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.88%), single female poverty (19.3% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.2%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Families | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Males | Excellent 10.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Females | Excellent 12.7% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.8% | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.4% | Good 16.2% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.1% | Exceptional 27.4% |
| Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Average 12.2% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.1% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 9.6%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.8%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.67%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Males | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Average 11.6% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Fair 17.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.1% | Average 10.3% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.7% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Average 4.7% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Fair 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 5.3% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Good 5.1% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.2% | Fair 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.70%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.9% | Poor 64.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Excellent 79.8% | Excellent 79.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.6% | Average 36.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.1% | Average 75.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Exceptional 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Average 82.8% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.5%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.3%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (48.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 1.3%), divorced or separated (11.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.5%), and currently married (47.1% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.8%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Family Households | Exceptional 67.5% | Tragic 63.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.1% | Tragic 26.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.36 | Tragic 3.14 |
| Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Average 6.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Currently Married | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.4% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 42.3%), no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 37.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 10.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.0%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 11.8% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.4% | Tragic 88.3% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.6% | Tragic 54.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 23.1% | Tragic 18.5% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 59.0%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 44.3%), and doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 37.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 95.9% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.6% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 96.4% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Exceptional 95.7% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 92.1% | Exceptional 94.7% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 90.9% | Exceptional 93.8% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.6% | Exceptional 92.7% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 87.2% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.1% | Exceptional 87.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Fair 64.5% | Exceptional 69.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Fair 58.5% | Exceptional 64.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Fair 45.2% | Exceptional 51.9% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.8% | Exceptional 44.0% |
| Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 4.0% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Poor 1.7% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from South Eastern Asia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Eastern Asia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (23.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.1%), disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.47%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from South Eastern Asia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Excellent 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 23.3% | Exceptional 21.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.7% | Exceptional 45.1% |
| Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Good 3.0% | Poor 3.1% |
| Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |