Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hong Kong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hong Kong

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Good
Excellent
7,848
SOCIAL INDEX
76.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
102nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Hong Kong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 146,080,909 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Hong Kong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hong Kong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hong Kong corresponds to a decrease of 1.3 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Hong Kong Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($128,140 compared to $106,888, a difference of 19.9%), median household income ($111,519 compared to $95,319, a difference of 17.0%), and median female earnings ($49,818 compared to $43,571, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income over 65 years ($71,567 compared to $66,376, a difference of 7.8%), and per capita income ($56,709 compared to $51,770, a difference of 9.5%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$56,709
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$131,067
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$111,519
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$59,433
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$70,146
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$49,818
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$62,083
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$128,140
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$127,500
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,567
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.5%
Tragic
27.3%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (12.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 18.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (12.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 17.3%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (10.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 3.0%), male poverty (9.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and poverty (10.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.4%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.3%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
16.5%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.2%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
24.4%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.8%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
9.6%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.2% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Average
11.6%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Good
17.4%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Poor
10.5%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.0%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.2%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Good
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.2%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.7%
Excellent
5.2%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.5% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.44%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.47%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.4%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.5%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
71.6%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.8%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
83.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (23.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 20.4%), divorced or separated (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.9% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.5%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.6%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
23.6%
Exceptional
28.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.1%), no vehicles in household (11.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 0.48%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.7%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
11.3%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
88.7%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.6%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.2%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Tragic
5.8%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.4%), doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.4%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.90%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.93%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.2%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.1%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
93.1%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Average
89.3%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.0%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.4%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
55.4%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
48.2%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.4%

Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hong Kong and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 26.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (8.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.2%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Hong KongImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.4%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.95%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.0%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%