Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Middle Africa
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,009,744 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 73.0 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,529 compared to $51,770, a difference of 31.0%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $106,888, a difference of 29.9%), and median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $62,217, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,916 compared to $54,352, a difference of 13.4%), householder income over 65 years ($58,375 compared to $66,376, a difference of 13.7%), and median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $43,571, a difference of 14.8%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,529 | Exceptional $51,770 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $93,593 | Exceptional $116,165 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $77,559 | Exceptional $95,319 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,416 | Exceptional $52,361 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $49,201 | Exceptional $62,217 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,965 | Exceptional $43,571 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,916 | Exceptional $54,352 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,254 | Exceptional $106,888 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,293 | Exceptional $111,914 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,375 | Exceptional $66,376 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 36.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 36.0%), and receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.0%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Exceptional 11.0% |
Families | Tragic 10.1% | Exceptional 7.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Females | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 11.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 19.1% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.8% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.7% | Exceptional 14.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Exceptional 13.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.9% | Exceptional 14.4% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.2% | Exceptional 14.2% |
Single Males | Good 12.7% | Exceptional 12.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.3% | Exceptional 19.0% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.6% | Good 16.2% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 27.4% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.1% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.1% | Excellent 11.7% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.43%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.43%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Unemployment | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Females | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 11.9% | Good 11.5% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.1% | Fair 17.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Fair 10.4% | Average 10.3% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Average 6.6% | Good 6.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Excellent 5.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.8% | Excellent 4.5% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 4.8% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Fair 4.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Good 5.3% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Good 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 8.4% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.1% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Poor 9.1% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.9% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 9.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.23%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 67.7% | Poor 64.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Excellent 79.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.9% | Average 36.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.6% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.2% | Exceptional 85.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.3% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.1%), births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 23.1%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.9% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.5%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.5%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 6.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Family Households | Tragic 61.9% | Tragic 63.4% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.0% | Tragic 26.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.8% | Exceptional 47.8% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.0% | Exceptional 48.4% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.7% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.9% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 15.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.19%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Tragic 11.8% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Tragic 88.3% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.4% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.2% | Tragic 18.5% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 38.4%), no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.0%), and master's degree (14.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.62%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.4% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.1% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.9% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.6% | Exceptional 93.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 92.7% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Exceptional 90.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 84.4% | Exceptional 87.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 69.6% |
College, 1 year or more | Poor 58.0% | Exceptional 64.1% |
Associate's Degree | Poor 44.7% | Exceptional 51.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Fair 36.6% | Exceptional 44.0% |
Master's Degree | Fair 14.6% | Exceptional 18.5% |
Professional Degree | Fair 4.2% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 20.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.54%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Middle Africa | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Excellent 10.9% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Exceptional 11.6% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Excellent 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.0% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Exceptional 21.0% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.1% | Exceptional 45.1% |
Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Poor 3.1% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 16.2% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Exceptional 2.4% |