Italian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,436,547 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Italian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.346. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Italians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Italians corresponds to an increase of 2.6 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Italian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,574 compared to $51,770, a difference of 8.8%), median female earnings ($41,505 compared to $43,571, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($49,915 compared to $52,361, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,224 compared to $111,914, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,426 compared to $54,352, a difference of 1.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,215 compared to $106,888, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Italian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 13.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 8.9%), and single father poverty (17.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 0.23%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.81%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.2% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Italian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 18.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.48%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Italian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.1% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.30%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Italian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.8% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 8.4%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.3%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.75%), currently married (48.8% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 0.98%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Italian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 36.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Italian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.2% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.29%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Italian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.6% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 0.99%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.5%).