Celtic vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,923,362 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.594. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.113% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 113.4 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($43,621 compared to $51,770, a difference of 18.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,241 compared to $106,888, a difference of 15.9%), and median family income ($101,139 compared to $116,165, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.030%), householder income under 25 years ($50,447 compared to $54,352, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $66,376, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 21.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.9%), married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 4.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.95%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.89%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 17.3%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.3%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.54%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.97%), and married-couple households (47.3% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 46.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.6%), master's degree (14.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.7%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.7% compared to 93.8%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 40.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.9%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 45.1%, a difference of 4.7%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.5%).