Zimbabwean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,970,453 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Zimbabwean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.252. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Zimbabweans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.073% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Zimbabweans corresponds to an increase of 73.0 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,804 compared to $51,770, a difference of 13.0%), median male earnings ($56,302 compared to $62,217, a difference of 10.5%), and median earnings ($48,229 compared to $52,361, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,854 compared to $66,376, a difference of 0.79%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,849 compared to $111,914, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 12.3%), single male poverty (13.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.20%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and male poverty (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 14.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 14.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 13.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 13.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.7%), and family households with children (27.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.4% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.88%), family households (64.1% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 0.99%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 30.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.0%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 5.4%), and master's degree (17.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.070%), 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.7% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 0.070%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Zimbabwean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.6%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 9.5%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.7%).