Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 152,396,971 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.637. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hawaiians corresponds to an increase of 4.0 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,403 compared to $51,770, a difference of 31.4%), median male earnings ($50,488 compared to $62,217, a difference of 23.2%), and median earnings ($43,673 compared to $52,361, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,920 compared to $66,376, a difference of 2.2%), householder income under 25 years ($53,078 compared to $54,352, a difference of 2.4%), and wage/income gap (24.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 34.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and family poverty (9.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 2.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.4% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.8%), single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.8% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.11%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (46.6% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 54.6%), no vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 46.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.0% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 31.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 69.1%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 61.6%), and master's degree (11.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 60.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hawaiian and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 23.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 8.5%).