Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Ethiopia
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
7,168
SOCIAL INDEX
69.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
129th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Immigrants from Ethiopia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,915,726 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Immigrant from Ethiopia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.026. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ethiopia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ethiopia corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 26.5%), per capita income ($45,923 compared to $51,770, a difference of 12.7%), and median male earnings ($55,434 compared to $62,217, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($65,238 compared to $66,376, a difference of 1.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,408 compared to $54,352, a difference of 1.8%), and median female earnings ($42,744 compared to $43,571, a difference of 1.9%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $45,923 | Exceptional $51,770 |
| Median Family Income | Excellent $106,969 | Exceptional $116,165 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $88,687 | Exceptional $95,319 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,924 | Exceptional $52,361 |
| Median Male Earnings | Good $55,434 | Exceptional $62,217 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,744 | Exceptional $43,571 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,408 | Exceptional $54,352 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,256 | Exceptional $106,888 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,763 | Exceptional $111,914 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $65,238 | Exceptional $66,376 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 27.3% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (13.4% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (16.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 17.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.1%), single mother poverty (27.7% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Poverty | Average 12.2% | Exceptional 11.0% |
| Families | Good 8.9% | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Males | Average 11.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Females | Good 13.3% | Exceptional 11.9% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.2% | Exceptional 19.1% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Children Under 5 years | Excellent 16.6% | Exceptional 14.8% |
| Children Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 13.9% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Average 16.4% | Exceptional 14.4% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Average 16.6% | Exceptional 14.2% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 12.1% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Exceptional 19.0% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 13.4% | Good 16.2% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 27.4% |
| Married Couples | Good 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.6% | Excellent 11.7% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.6% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.74%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Males | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.3% | Good 11.5% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Fair 17.8% | Fair 17.8% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.6% | Average 10.3% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Good 6.6% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Excellent 5.3% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.5% | Excellent 4.5% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Excellent 4.4% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Fair 4.8% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Fair 4.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Good 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Good 5.1% |
| Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.9% | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Fair 9.0% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (69.4% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.6% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 69.4% | Poor 64.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 82.1% | Excellent 79.9% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.6% | Average 36.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.5% | Average 75.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 86.1% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.6% | Exceptional 85.4% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.9% | Exceptional 84.8% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 84.8% | Exceptional 83.4% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 24.3%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 18.9%), and married-couple households (43.1% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 3.3%), average family size (3.25 compared to 3.14, a difference of 3.4%), and family households (61.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 3.6%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Family Households | Tragic 61.2% | Tragic 63.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Tragic 26.2% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.1% | Exceptional 47.8% |
| Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Tragic 3.14 |
| Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Poor 6.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 48.4% |
| Divorced or Separated | Average 12.1% | Exceptional 11.7% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.7% | Exceptional 28.4% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.9% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.75%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.0%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Vehicles Available | Average 10.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Average 89.6% | Tragic 88.3% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 53.0% | Tragic 54.1% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.7% | Tragic 5.8% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.8%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and bachelor's degree (42.5% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.68%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.68%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Exceptional 98.2% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 97.4% | Exceptional 98.1% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.0% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 97.9% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Exceptional 97.7% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.4% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Exceptional 96.6% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 95.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 94.3% | Exceptional 95.7% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.7% |
| 11th Grade | Poor 92.1% | Exceptional 93.8% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Fair 90.9% | Exceptional 92.7% |
| High School Diploma | Fair 88.9% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Good 86.0% | Exceptional 87.9% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.0% | Exceptional 69.6% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.6% | Exceptional 64.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.1% | Exceptional 51.9% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.5% | Exceptional 44.0% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.9% | Exceptional 18.5% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.4% |
Immigrants from Ethiopia vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ethiopia and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 16.4%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 10.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and female disability (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.5%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Ethiopia | Immigrants from Czechoslovakia |
| Disability | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Excellent 10.9% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.6% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Excellent 1.2% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.2% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Exceptional 6.3% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 10.0% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Excellent 22.7% | Exceptional 21.0% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Excellent 46.8% | Exceptional 45.1% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.7% | Poor 3.1% |
| Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 5.8% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.2% | Exceptional 2.4% |