Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Czechoslovakia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia

Excellent
Excellent
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,836
SOCIAL INDEX
85.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
45th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 142,069,330 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.656. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.037% in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 36.9 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia.
Chilean Integration in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Communities

Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $51,770, a difference of 11.4%), median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $62,217, a difference of 9.2%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $52,361, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $54,352, a difference of 2.2%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $66,376, a difference of 3.8%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Income
Income MetricChileanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Exceptional
$51,770
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Exceptional
$116,165
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Exceptional
$95,319
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Exceptional
$52,361
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Exceptional
$62,217
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Exceptional
$43,571
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Exceptional
$54,352
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Exceptional
$106,888
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Exceptional
$111,914
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Exceptional
$66,376
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.3%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 13.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 0.020%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Exceptional
11.0%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.7%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
10.0%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Exceptional
11.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
12.1%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
14.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Exceptional
13.9%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
14.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Exceptional
14.2%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Exceptional
12.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
19.0%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Good
16.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Exceptional
27.4%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Exceptional
4.6%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Excellent
11.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Exceptional
9.6%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.57%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Fair
17.8%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Excellent
5.3%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Excellent
4.5%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Excellent
4.4%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Fair
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Fair
4.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Good
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Exceptional
7.0%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Fair
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Excellent
5.2%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 36.6%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.63%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Excellent
79.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Average
36.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Exceptional
85.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Exceptional
83.4%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 15.1%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.55%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (65.2% compared to 63.4%, a difference of 2.7%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Tragic
63.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
26.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Exceptional
47.8%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Tragic
3.14
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Exceptional
48.4%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Exceptional
28.4%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 19.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.3%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 6.6%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Tragic
11.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Tragic
88.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Tragic
18.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Tragic
5.8%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 12.0%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Exceptional
98.0%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Exceptional
94.7%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Exceptional
93.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Exceptional
92.7%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Exceptional
69.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Exceptional
64.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Exceptional
51.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Exceptional
44.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Exceptional
18.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.4%

Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.5%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.050%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.86%), and female disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.89%).
Chilean vs Immigrants from Czechoslovakia Disability
Disability MetricChileanImmigrants from Czechoslovakia
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Excellent
10.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.6%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Excellent
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Exceptional
21.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Exceptional
45.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Exceptional
16.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%