Scotch-Irish vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,316,482 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.477. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 50.1 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 13.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,073 compared to $85,787, a difference of 13.2%), and median family income ($99,591 compared to $88,556, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $47,518, a difference of 3.2%), median female earnings ($37,383 compared to $35,661, a difference of 4.8%), and median earnings ($44,924 compared to $41,519, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 32.5%), family poverty (8.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 29.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.45%), single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 7.8%), and single male poverty (14.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 49.3%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.6% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 21.9%), and male unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 10.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.55%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.2%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and single father households (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.4% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.4%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 50.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 3.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.0%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 21.7%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.60%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 37.6%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.7%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and female disability (13.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 5.4%).