Barbadian vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,326,457 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.036% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to a decrease of 36.1 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 32.0%), median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $35,661, a difference of 15.7%), and per capita income ($42,406 compared to $38,088, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,163 compared to $54,922, a difference of 1.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $85,787, a difference of 5.2%), and median family income ($93,919 compared to $88,556, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.8%), receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.4%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.14%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 0.36%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (12.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 26.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.99%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 21.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.3%), married-couple households (39.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.67%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (62.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 154.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 73.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 66.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 21.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 47.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 66.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.1%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (61.1% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 0.48%), nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%), and 3rd grade (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 57.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 35.4%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 1.7%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 7.6%).