Ecuadorian vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,612,866 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.174. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 4.3 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $47,518, a difference of 13.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $82,152, a difference of 11.5%), and median household income ($82,070 compared to $73,747, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $54,922, a difference of 0.070%), median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $48,202, a difference of 7.0%), and median family income ($95,114 compared to $88,556, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 28.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.0% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.24%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 20.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 15.2%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 10.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.66%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (65.0% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 122.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 52.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 15.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 49.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 43.4%), master's degree (14.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 15.7%), and professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (54.3% compared to 54.4%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (97.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 57.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 43.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 38.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 8.1%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 12.4%).