Kiowa vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,741,851 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Kiowa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.224. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Kiowa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.124% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Kiowa corresponds to an increase of 124.2 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,815 compared to $85,787, a difference of 14.7%), median household income ($65,914 compared to $73,747, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,776 compared to $82,152, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,074 compared to $35,661, a difference of 4.7%), median earnings ($39,232 compared to $41,519, a difference of 5.8%), and wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 23.7%), single father poverty (22.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 21.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 4.0%), single mother poverty (35.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 4.5%), and single female poverty (26.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 24.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.040%), male unemployment (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (79.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.2% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 17.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.1%), and divorced or separated (14.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.60%), family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 12.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 4.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 25.0%), professional degree (3.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (90.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.15%), high school diploma (88.2% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Kiowa and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 18.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (17.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 17.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (32.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.030%), cognitive disability (18.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 3.6%).