Chilean vs Comanche Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Comanche
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Comanche
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Comanche Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,491,278 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.643. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.394% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 393.9 Comanche.
Chilean vs Comanche Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $85,787, a difference of 24.3%), median household income ($90,605 compared to $73,747, a difference of 22.9%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $88,556, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $47,518, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $35,661, a difference of 14.3%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Comanche |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Tragic $38,088 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Tragic $88,556 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Tragic $73,747 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Tragic $41,519 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Tragic $48,202 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Tragic $35,661 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Tragic $47,518 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Tragic $82,152 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Tragic $85,787 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Tragic $54,922 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Excellent 25.0% |
Chilean vs Comanche Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 35.1%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.1%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 17.6%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Comanche |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Tragic 15.0% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Tragic 11.0% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Tragic 16.2% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 23.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Tragic 16.5% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 21.0% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 19.9% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 20.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Tragic 20.2% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 16.0% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 25.6% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Tragic 18.5% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 33.9% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Tragic 13.3% |
Chilean vs Comanche Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 26.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 21.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Comanche |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.8% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Poor 5.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Poor 11.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Tragic 20.2% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Excellent 10.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.8% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 4.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 8.0% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Fair 9.0% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.1% |
Chilean vs Comanche Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Comanche |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 77.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Exceptional 37.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Good 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 81.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 79.2% |
Chilean vs Comanche Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 19.7%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 14.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.66%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.9%), and family households (65.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Comanche |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Tragic 63.5% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Good 27.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Tragic 44.5% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Tragic 7.0% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Tragic 45.0% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Tragic 36.7% |
Chilean vs Comanche Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.32%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 0.62%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Comanche |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Good 10.2% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Good 89.9% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Excellent 56.5% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 6.8% |
Chilean vs Comanche Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 48.8%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 40.0%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.010%), 2nd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Comanche |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Good 2.1% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Good 98.0% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Good 98.0% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Good 97.9% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Average 97.8% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Average 97.5% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Average 97.3% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Fair 97.0% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Fair 95.8% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Poor 95.5% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Poor 94.6% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Tragic 91.7% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Tragic 89.9% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Tragic 83.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 61.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 54.4% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 39.9% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 31.9% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 12.1% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chilean vs Comanche Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 44.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 38.1%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 37.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.1%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 9.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 11.3%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Comanche |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 14.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 14.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Average 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 8.3% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 28.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 51.7% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.8% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 4.0% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 7.5% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.9% |