Samoan vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,518,337 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.755. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.070% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to an increase of 70.3 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $54,922, a difference of 19.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,580 compared to $85,787, a difference of 18.4%), and median household income ($86,498 compared to $73,747, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 3.7%), per capita income ($39,826 compared to $38,088, a difference of 4.6%), and median female earnings ($37,498 compared to $35,661, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 37.5%), single father poverty (13.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 33.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 9.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.55%), and unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.8%), births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 12.6%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.5%), currently married (46.8% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.25, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 35.8%), no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 34.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 10.4%), no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.6% compared to 94.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (95.4% compared to 95.5%, a difference of 0.12%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 22.2%), and ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.1%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 4.1%), and disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 4.4%).