Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 58,662,674 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.601% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to an increase of 600.8 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $38,088, a difference of 24.4%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $88,556, a difference of 22.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($104,992 compared to $85,787, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $47,518, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,643 compared to $54,922, a difference of 15.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.6%), family poverty (8.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 34.8%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 9.2%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 14.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 35.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 5.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 0.73%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 21.0%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 0.010%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.36%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 1.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 49.2%), master's degree (17.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 44.2%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 38.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.2%), and hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.2%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 9.6%).