Swiss vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,559,228 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Swiss communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.087. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Swiss within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Swiss corresponds to an increase of 4.8 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Swiss and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,071 compared to $85,787, a difference of 20.2%), wage/income gap (30.0% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 19.7%), and median family income ($104,396 compared to $88,556, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,904 compared to $35,661, a difference of 6.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,493 compared to $47,518, a difference of 8.4%), and median earnings ($46,315 compared to $41,519, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Swiss and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 43.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 39.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 7.0%), single mother poverty (29.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 14.2%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Swiss and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 42.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Swiss and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.3% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 14.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Swiss and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.9%), births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 20.5%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.21%), family households (65.2% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 30.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.0% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Swiss and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 34.9%), professional degree (4.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 26.7%), and doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Swiss and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 31.7%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 31.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 11.1%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 11.8%).