Immigrants from Congo vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 47,840,607 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Immigrant from Congo communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Congo within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Congo corresponds to an increase of 15.0 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (21.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 15.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($72,178 compared to $82,152, a difference of 13.8%), and median household income ($66,768 compared to $73,747, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($34,317 compared to $35,661, a difference of 3.9%), median earnings ($39,169 compared to $41,519, a difference of 6.0%), and per capita income ($35,720 compared to $38,088, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 20.1%), single male poverty (13.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 15.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.9% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.8% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 0.41%), single female poverty (25.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.13%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.78%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 15.4%), married-couple households (39.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 14.0%), and currently married (41.1% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.8% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 0.20%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.24%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 23.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.14%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.1% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.0%), bachelor's degree (33.6% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and associate's degree (41.8% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.42%), college, under 1 year (61.7% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 0.42%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Congo and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 36.5%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (19.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.9%), and disability age over 75 (48.7% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 6.1%).