Ute vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 37,837,923 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Ute communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.611. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ute within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ute corresponds to an increase of 35.8 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ute and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.8% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 11.0%), householder income under 25 years ($49,997 compared to $47,518, a difference of 5.2%), and per capita income ($36,651 compared to $38,088, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $82,152, a difference of 0.020%), median family income ($87,596 compared to $88,556, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($41,051 compared to $41,519, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ute and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in male poverty (16.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 18.1%), poverty (16.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 13.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.18%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.80%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ute and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 38.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 38.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ute and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (78.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (80.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ute and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 16.9%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.25, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.14%), single mother households (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (64.3% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ute and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 28.9%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 13.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 0.21%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ute and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 28.3%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 13.8%), and no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.7% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.15%), 5th grade (97.4% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 6th grade (97.1% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ute and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.86% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 44.4%), ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 25.9%), and male disability (11.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (52.6% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 7.7%).