Alsatian vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,439,637 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Alsatian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.916. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alsatians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.171% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alsatians corresponds to an increase of 1,170.9 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,284 compared to $38,088, a difference of 24.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,435 compared to $85,787, a difference of 17.1%), and median family income ($103,010 compared to $88,556, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($49,267 compared to $47,518, a difference of 3.7%), and median female earnings ($40,060 compared to $35,661, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 16.0%), family poverty (9.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.9%), and married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (34.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 1.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (24.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.50%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 18.1%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.8% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.69%), currently married (45.7% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and family households (61.7% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 28.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 25.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.1% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 3.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.5% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 47.4%), master's degree (16.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 39.6%), and doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 36.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alsatian and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 27.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 24.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.8% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 3.4%), cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 9.3%).