Apache vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,536,621 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Apache communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.927. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Apache within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.973% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Apache corresponds to an increase of 973.2 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Apache and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,886 compared to $38,088, a difference of 9.2%), median family income ($84,451 compared to $88,556, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,184 compared to $85,787, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,668 compared to $54,922, a difference of 0.46%), wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and median female earnings ($34,895 compared to $35,661, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Apache and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 49.8%), receiving food stamps (18.3% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 37.9%), and single male poverty (21.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 7.9%), single female poverty (27.7% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Apache and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 61.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 53.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (7.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 50.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.8% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.5% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Apache and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.2% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Apache and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.1%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.8%), and births to unmarried women (39.9% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.4%), currently married (43.2% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Apache and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 8.5%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.86%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Apache and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (28.3% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 12.8%), master's degree (11.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and associate's degree (36.2% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Apache and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.0% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 63.5%), self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 6.7%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.040%), male disability (14.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 0.40%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 1.0%).