English vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,777,552 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within English communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.357. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in English within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.020% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 English corresponds to an increase of 19.6 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between English and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,021 compared to $85,787, a difference of 18.9%), wage/income gap (29.5% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and median family income ($103,684 compared to $88,556, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,805 compared to $47,518, a difference of 6.9%), median female earnings ($38,196 compared to $35,661, a difference of 7.1%), and median earnings ($46,334 compared to $41,519, a difference of 11.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between English and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 41.5%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 40.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.8% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 3.8%), single mother poverty (30.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and single male poverty (14.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between English and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 50.8%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.1% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between English and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 12.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.5% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between English and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.2%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and married-couple households (49.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (65.1% compared to 63.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between English and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 57.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.8% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.9% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between English and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 48.7%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 24.7%), and master's degree (14.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.69%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between English and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 34.4%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 22.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.6%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.7%).