Pennsylvania German vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 74,872,261 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.412. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to an increase of 30.8 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 22.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,956 compared to $85,787, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $47,518, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($37,842 compared to $38,088, a difference of 0.65%), median female earnings ($34,802 compared to $35,661, a difference of 2.5%), and median earnings ($42,615 compared to $41,519, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 25.4%), male poverty (11.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and poverty (12.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 2.1%), single male poverty (15.6% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 52.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 33.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 23.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.42%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 21.0%), married-couple households (50.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 13.1%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.6%, a difference of 0.88%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.8%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 12.2%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.69%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.9%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.61%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 56.9%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 27.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%), female disability (13.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 5.8%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 6.0%).