Immigrants from Latin America vs Comanche Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,388,942 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Comanche within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.275. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Comanche. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Comanche.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $47,518, a difference of 8.1%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and per capita income ($36,823 compared to $38,088, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,166 compared to $82,152, a difference of 0.020%), median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $35,661, a difference of 1.0%), and median earnings ($41,049 compared to $41,519, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 21.9%), married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 20.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (15.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.54%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 0.88%), and male poverty (13.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 34.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 23.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.89%), male unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 37.7%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 79.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.66%), in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.5%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.7% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 0.32%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 36.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and currently married (43.8% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 5.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 56.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.050%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and college, under 1 year (56.3% compared to 61.4%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Comanche communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 39.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 32.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 28.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 51.7%, a difference of 4.4%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.1%).