Chilean vs Malaysian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Chilean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Chileans

Malaysians

Excellent
Fair
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Malaysian Integration in Chilean Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 151,670,055 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Malaysians within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.524. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.291% in Malaysians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 290.5 Malaysians.
Chilean Integration in Malaysian Communities

Chilean vs Malaysian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $39,194, a difference of 18.5%), median family income ($108,429 compared to $95,230, a difference of 13.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $88,291, a difference of 13.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $51,615, a difference of 3.0%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 25.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $37,298, a difference of 9.3%).
Chilean vs Malaysian Income
Income MetricChileanMalaysian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,459
Tragic
$39,194
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,429
Tragic
$95,230
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,605
Tragic
$81,064
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,504
Tragic
$43,844
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$56,973
Tragic
$50,772
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$40,757
Tragic
$37,298
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,185
Poor
$51,615
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$99,900
Tragic
$88,291
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,611
Tragic
$94,517
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,957
Tragic
$58,244
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Excellent
25.0%

Chilean vs Malaysian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 18.3%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.9%, a difference of 5.1%).
Chilean vs Malaysian Poverty
Poverty MetricChileanMalaysian
Poverty
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
13.1%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Poor
9.6%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
12.0%
Females
Excellent
12.9%
Tragic
14.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.1%
Good
19.9%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Tragic
14.7%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.8%
Tragic
17.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
17.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
17.8%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
14.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Poor
29.7%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Fair
5.4%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.2%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Poor
12.6%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
11.0%
Tragic
12.7%

Chilean vs Malaysian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.53%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.88%).
Chilean vs Malaysian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricChileanMalaysian
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Average
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Excellent
11.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
17.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Good
6.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Average
5.5%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Average
4.5%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Poor
8.9%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Fair
7.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Excellent
8.8%
Exceptional
8.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Fair
5.5%

Chilean vs Malaysian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 11.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.41%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.80%).
Chilean vs Malaysian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricChileanMalaysian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.0%
Exceptional
66.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Fair
79.5%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Poor
35.8%
Exceptional
39.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.5%
Exceptional
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
85.0%
Average
84.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
84.9%
Tragic
84.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Tragic
83.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
82.0%

Chilean vs Malaysian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 23.2%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 19.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.1%), currently married (47.0% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.31, a difference of 2.4%).
Chilean vs Malaysian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricChileanMalaysian
Family Households
Exceptional
65.2%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
29.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.5%
Average
46.3%
Average Family Size
Average
3.23
Exceptional
3.31
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Currently Married
Good
47.0%
Poor
45.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.7%
Tragic
33.9%

Chilean vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 28.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 6.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 14.8%).
Chilean vs Malaysian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricChileanMalaysian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Exceptional
7.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.2%
Exceptional
92.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.1%
Exceptional
59.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Good
19.7%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.4%
Exceptional
7.7%

Chilean vs Malaysian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 54.9%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 47.8%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 40.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.75%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.76%).
Chilean vs Malaysian Education Level
Education Level MetricChileanMalaysian
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Tragic
97.2%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.2%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Tragic
97.1%
3rd Grade
Average
97.8%
Tragic
97.0%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Tragic
96.7%
5th Grade
Average
97.3%
Tragic
96.5%
6th Grade
Average
97.1%
Tragic
96.2%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Tragic
94.8%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Tragic
93.5%
10th Grade
Good
93.9%
Tragic
92.2%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Tragic
90.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Excellent
91.7%
Tragic
89.2%
High School Diploma
Good
89.6%
Tragic
87.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Tragic
83.3%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
67.6%
Tragic
62.2%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.0%
Tragic
55.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.4%
Tragic
41.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
41.2%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.9%
Tragic
12.0%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.5%

Chilean vs Malaysian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Malaysian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 21.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.92%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.5%).
Chilean vs Malaysian Disability
Disability MetricChileanMalaysian
Disability
Exceptional
11.1%
Tragic
12.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Poor
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
17.9%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%