Chilean vs Immigrants Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 256,677,815 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.259. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.779% in Immigrants. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to a decrease of 778.6 Immigrants.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $43,010, a difference of 8.0%), median family income ($108,429 compared to $100,962, a difference of 7.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $59,656, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $53,201, a difference of 0.030%), median female earnings ($40,757 compared to $39,328, a difference of 3.6%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $46,478, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.0%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 18.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.97%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 1.1%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.4%), female unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.50%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 65.4%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 84.1%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 11.7%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.8%), and births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 32.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.14%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.7%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.77%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.2%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.44%), male disability (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.1%).