Chilean vs Immigrants from Japan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,357,800 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Japan within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.376. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.157% in Immigrants from Japan. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 157.0 Immigrants from Japan.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $65,518, a difference of 15.0%), per capita income ($46,459 compared to $53,359, a difference of 14.8%), and median earnings ($48,504 compared to $54,938, a difference of 13.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $55,932, a difference of 5.2%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 6.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $69,774, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 22.3%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 14.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 9.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.49%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 34.7%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.51%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.3%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.7%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.5% compared to 47.7%, a difference of 0.33%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.18, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (47.0% compared to 48.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 15.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.7%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 29.4%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Japan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 19.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 0.29%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.0%).