Chilean vs Arapaho Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,357,696 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Arapaho within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.668. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.083% in Arapaho. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 83.4 Arapaho.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $32,345, a difference of 43.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $75,945, a difference of 40.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,900 compared to $71,697, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $59,383, a difference of 7.7%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 23.5%, a difference of 12.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $44,003, a difference of 20.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 84.1%), single father poverty (15.7% compared to 24.0%, a difference of 52.7%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 49.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.50%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 33.4%, a difference of 19.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 164.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 146.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 137.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 3.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 11.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 78.1%, a difference of 8.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 77.1%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 0.99%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 37.3%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 53.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 31.0%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 2.0%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.64, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 46.2%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 60.2%, a difference of 7.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 84.5%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 82.9%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.9% compared to 94.2%, a difference of 0.31%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.4%, a difference of 0.54%), and 4th grade (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Arapaho communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 47.1%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 44.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.70%), cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 7.2%).