Chilean vs Immigrants from Australia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,548,546 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Australia within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Immigrants from Australia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 9.2 Immigrants from Australia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $57,953, a difference of 24.7%), median male earnings ($56,973 compared to $67,634, a difference of 18.7%), and median family income ($108,429 compared to $126,620, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $56,660, a difference of 6.5%), wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $69,164, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 20.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 12.8%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 0.10%), single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 6.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 35.1%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.75%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.66%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 20.3%), births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 26.6%, a difference of 15.2%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.56%), married-couple households (47.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.13, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 39.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 52.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 31.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 30.2%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Immigrants from Australia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 10.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.75%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 45.5%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.6%).